FROM David Martinez blog

Canelo Defeats Ryder by Unanimous Decision

MiddleweightsRecent Fightsadmin

By Tom Donelson / Member Boxing Writers Association of America (BWAA)

This was fight designed to be coronation for Saul “Canelo” Alvarez in front of his fellow countrymen in Mexico as he faced John Ryder, British Supermiddleweight.  This fight was easy to score as Alvarez dominated . I had it 120-107 but you might have given Ryder a couple of rounds in which two of the judges did. 

The Compubox numbers told the full story as Alvarez landed more than double the punches Ryder 179 to 80 including nearly 47 percent of power shots and was the more accurate puncher with nearly 40 percent to Ryder 17 percent.  There was not one round in which Alvarez didn’t out land Ryder in punches and there was no doubt who was the stronger puncher and Ryder rarely penetrated Alvarez defense .

In third round, Alvarez landed a solid right that shook Ryder and in the fourth round, Alvarez bloodied Ryder’s nose while he landed punches in which Ryder couldn’t get out of the way.  Ryder opened up the fifth round with a jab, but Canelo answered with a jab of his own along with a right to the chest.  A traditional one -two sent Ryder down and as he came up from the canvas, he was a bloodied mess and continued to fight back . The Champ threw a massive right that missed.

In the seventh round, Alvarez continued to stagger Ryder, but Ryder held tough as he took the punishment.  Throughout the eighth and ninth round, Canelo Alvarez jab forward and his jab set up combinations.  Alvarez left few openings for Ryder to connect and most of Ryder punches bounced off Alvarez’s gloves . In the ninth, an Alvarez right wobbled Ryder and the referee took a close look but allowed Ryder to continue.

The tenth round may have been Ryder best as he slipped punches, but Alvarez continued to move forward to stop the fight, but Ryder landed a few punches to neutralized Alvarez’s attacks.   In the eleventh round, Ryder continued to fight but the action started to drag as both men showed exhaustion and the referee kept separating.  The round ended with an Alvarez big right .

The final round was anticlimactic.  Alvarez let his right hand go but Ryder came back with his own right.  Ryder threw punches in bunches, hoping to take the round.  He landed a good right and landed a few body shots.  Ryder was aggressive but it was too little and too late, but he survived the round and the fight

The official scores was 120-107, 118-109, 118-109 and it was accurate description of the fight.  I had it as a shut out but the final round and maybe the tenth could have gone for Ryder but not much more.   

Alvarez won and showed he could defeat those fighters ranked below but now where does Alvarez go from here?

There are many good fights to line including undefeated Middleweight Jermall Charlo, Super Middleweight David Benavidez, or David Morrell as well undefeated light heavyweight Artur Beterbiev but the real bout that Alvarez wants is Dmitry Bivol, who defeated Alvarez.  Bivol showed that he was one of the two best light heavyweights and showed that maybe for Alvarez, the light heavyweight division might be one step to much.  Up to this point, Alvarez has been able to bring his power up to Super Middleweight and he did stop former lightweight champ Sergey Kovalev, but Bivol was able to take Alvarez’s best shots.  Would a rematch be any different?  Alvarez would like to find out if it would be any different.

Leaving Blue Paradise

Ken Griffin too his business, the hedge fund Citadel, out of Chicago to Florida and this represented a trend that has been occurring, many wealthy are saying goodbye New IRS data found for example that more than 100,000 people left Illinois and they took some billion dollars nearly double its 2019 and an in New York, some nearly 25 billion dollars has left the state and California loss 29 billion dollars. 

That people migrating from these states are taking not just money but their expertise leaves with them.  Those coming into these blue states earn $35,000 less than those they are replacing and in Florida, those who came into the state averaged 150,000 dollars whereas those who left averaged less than half.   For many of these states the golden goose that provided the golden eggs are going elsewhere.

The problem as Wall Street journal writer Allysia Finley observed, “Cities are losing the voters who keep their leaders from going off the rails.” In Chicago, Brandon Johnson won by 20,000 which is but small percentage of the 175,000 who left Cook County or as Finney noted, “These are the people the city needs to back on the rails.

This trends cut in two ways. First, many investors, business leaders and wealthy citizens are leaving and taking their wealth with them.  Second, they are leaving behind what is left of escape.

Meaning of Tucker

Tucker Carlson demise on Fox may lead to a new direction in the media. My own view of Tucker Carlson was mixed, while I viewed him as a unique voice that represented forgotten America, and his view was more of a populist view versus a conservative view. Fox big mistake was first letting him go but the second was the unceremonious way they let him go. The sudden way that Tucker was released showed the classness of Fox and equally as bad, a complete disrespect for their audience.

Tucker represent a wave of conservatism and the American public that is often ignored even by conservatism. Fox represent a more traditional conservative that came out of the sixties and become prevalent in the 1980’s. It should be pointed out that Reaganonomics worked for over two decades to raise the middle class from early 1980’s going into the 21st century. In the 1970’s, stagflation produce economic stagnation and many middle class found themselves in tax bracket reserved for the wealth a generation earlier.  Supply side tax cuts benefited the Middle Class and engineered a 25 year economic growth that extended into 21st century.

This century has been different as America has changed, the rise of China and movement of businesses moving their factories overseas including China and massive illegal immigration that had immigrants competing with many Americans on the lower income strata for jobs. For many Americans, income not only was stagnant but overall wealth decline as many saw their housing prices dropped and many more left the investor class as Americans investors dropped from 63 percent in 2007 to 53 percent. Millions of Americans lost opportunities to expand their overall wealth and saw instead their wealth decrease to go with stagnant income. Carlson noted to John Hinderaker, “I always thought that the dividing line between liberal and conservative was economic. And that conservatives were champions of the free market and liberals were very suspicious of it. That really was the dividing line for a long time. There were other demarcations, but that was the main one. And the free-market argument won. It did, thanks to a lot of things, but liberals during the Clinton years joined in celebrating market capitalism…I am still for the free market, but the middle class is dying, and that’s not one man’s opinion. That’s a fact rooted in data. It’s shrinking in size. The life expectancy of blue-collar America is declining. That’s never happened. So, you have to ask, what did we get wrong? What assumptions did we have that turned out to be untrue? Free trade brings prosperity? Yeah, but not to everybody.”

He added,” Oh, it’s over. Capitalism lost because the people in charge didn’t pay any attention to the effects at all, and so with the average millennial it is far less likely that his parents are married or own a home, he owns his own car, or they own two cars. We’ve saddled people with overwhelming levels of debt—student loan debt primarily, but other kinds, too—that we’ve basically crushed an entire generation of kids. And they’re really angry.”  He represent a thought by many who view that the system is rigged and has failed them. Even on the right, there are many like Carlson who don’t believe that market economy works for them. Carlson made the point I have made in my books, that for many including on the right, the movement left is moving economics. In my report “From Trump to Le Pen, Where Does Populism Ends Up?”  I observed, “France is where the future of the populist movement may lie if Trump fails to move his agenda and improve the lot of American workers. Marine Le Pen is not a traditional American conservative or even a believer in free market. Many of Le Pen’s views mirror the hard-core left, embodied by Jean-Luc Melenchon, including her promise to maintain the 35-hour work week and lower the retirement age to 60. (The two combined actually collected 42% of the vote in first round voting in the 2017 French Presidential election showing political strength.)”  Carlson added, “When people don’t get married and don’t buy homes and aren’t rooted in the society long term, they’re volatile and scary, and their politics tend to be crazy. It’s really bad. You don’t want to ever let that happen. We let it happen. We didn’t pay any attention at all. All of that money was transferred to the Baby Boomers, and they’re about to feel the effects of that because economic populism is the future. I don’t want it. I’m just telling you. I’d bet my house on it. Bernie Sanders is going to seem moderate compared to the next guy.”

On the left, Robert Kennedy Jr. opposition to the Covid vaccines mandates and the overall lost of freedom by various mandates including closing schools and businesses mirrored much on the right and his recent statement opposing central banking digital currency and remarking that one can be in favor of legal immigration and still oppose illegal immigration are uniting points for merging of the right and forces on the left.

Conservative are left with the task of combining an agenda that benefits the Middle Class and allow the poor to move up the economic ladder while defending free market economy. We are dealing with a culture war that is far larger than culture wars in the past. It is not just about abortion but also parents finding their daughters competing with transgender women (men) in sports and called bigots if they want their daughters to compete with only other women. It is about defending those basic principles that bring success like showing up to work on time, the do best you can in school and wait tuntil you are married before having children. These were values that wasn’t even debatable but advocating hem now marks you as supporting “White privilege.” We are living in a land where the cultural norm will be mediocrity as opposed to meritocracy.

Glenn Harlan Reynolds described the suicide of expertise: “It was the experts — characterized in terms of their self-image by David Halberstam in The Best and the Brightest — who brought us the twin debacles of the Vietnam War, which we lost, and the War On Poverty, where we spent trillions and certainly didn’t win. In both cases, confidential assertions by highly credential authorities foundered upon reality, at a dramatic cost in blood and treasure. Mostly other people’s blood and treasured, and these are not isolated failures.”

 Over the past decade, we have seen the Great Recession, due to a housing bubble engineered by existing laws and promoted by the best and brightest on Wall Street. Trump inherited a foreign policy debacle in the Middle East engineered by Obama’s experts, who produced a policy that led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, a million refugees headed for Europe, the rise of ISIS, and the upending of previous relations between the U.S. and the State of Israel. Nor can we forget the toppling of Moammar Gadhafi, which led to Libya becoming yet another sanctuary for Islamic terrorists and another places where refugees fled the Middle East for Europe. A year after the toppling of Gadhafi, attack on two United States facilities resulted in the death of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three others.

Glenn Harlan Reynolds concluded, “If experts want to reclaim a position of authority, they need to make a few changes. First, they should make sure they know what they’re talking about, and they shouldn’t talk about things where their knowledge isn’t solid. Second, they should be appropriately modest in their claims of authority. And third, they should check their egos. It doesn’t matter what your SAT scores were, voters are under no obligation to listen to you unless they find what you say persuasive.” Modesty is not a trait that this generation of the Leadership class has demonstrated. The elites have done well while the ordinary folks in fly over country have seen their incomes plummet and their ability to make a fortune shrivel. The expert class who guided America from the 1940 to the 1960’s won a world war, designed a bipartisan policy of containment that prevented World War III and a victory over the Soviet Empire presided over by two members of that generation, Ronald Reagan, and George H.W. Bush. The Greatest Generation discovered vaccines for polio, antibiotics that saved lives, and sent a man to the moon. Jet planes and space flights were dreams that became reality and it was that generation that began to redress the wrongs done to our Black citizens. The present generation of experts may have given us computers, and the computing power in our hands is greater that what took Apollo flights to the Moon. While planes have become faster, the time to get from point A to B is longer and while cars may have advantages over the cars of the 1950’s, the average person in 1950 would have little trouble recognizing or driving what we drive today. There are no flying cars, and we are replacing reliable nuclear power with less reliable energy derived from wind and solar power. The electric car is a century-old technology that is hardly a major advance in automotive history. And again, where are the flying cars?

Tucker Carlson has shown the failure of the political class and on a daily basis, he pointed out their failures. Carlson is a voice that details the struggle of the forgotten American and idiocy that the Leadership class has imposed on them. Carlson chronicles the reality America is indeed standing on the Abyss.

Alvarez wins

This was fight designed to be coronation for Saul “Canelo” Alvarez in front of his fellow countrymen in Mexico as he faced John Ryder, British Supermiddleweight.  This fight was easy to score as Alvarez dominated. I had it 120-107 but you might have given Ryder a couple of rounds in which two of the judges did. 

The Compubox numbers told the full story as Alvarez landed more than double the punches Ryder 179 to 80 including nearly 47 percent of power shots and was the more accurate puncher with nearly 40 percent to Ryder 17 percent.  There was not one round in which Alvarez didn’t out land Ryder in punches and there was no doubt who was the stronger puncher and Ryder rarely penetrated Alvarez defense.

In third round, Alvarez landed a solid right that shook Ryder and in the fourth round, Alvarez bloodied Ryder’s nose while he landed punches in which Ryder couldn’t get out of the way.  Ryder opened up the fifth round with a jab, but Canelo answered with a jab of his own along with a right to the chest.  A traditional one -two sent Ryder down and as he came up from the canvas, he was a bloodied mess and continued to fight back. The Champ threw a massive right that missed. 

In the seventh round, Alvarez continued to stagger Ryder, but Ryder held tough as he took the punishment.  Throughout the eighth and ninth round, Canelo Alvarez jab forward and his jab set up combinations.  Alvarez left few openings for Ryder to connect and most of Ryder punches bounced off Alvarez’s gloves. In the ninth, an Alvarez right wobbled Ryder and the referee took a close look but allowed Ryder to continue.

The tenth round may have been Ryder best as he slipped punches, but Alvarez continued to move forward to stop the fight, but Ryder landed a few punches to neutralized Alvarez’s attacks.   In the eleventh round, Ryder continued to fight but the action started to drag as both men showed exhaustion and the referee kept separating.  The round ended with an Alvarez big right.

The final round was anticlimactic.  Alvarez let his right hand go but Ryder came back with his own right.  Ryder threw punches in bunches, hoping to take the round.  He landed a good right and landed a few body shots.  Ryder was aggressive but it was too little and too late, but he survived the round and the fight

The official scores was 120-107, 118-109, 118-109 and it was accurate description of the fight.  I had it as a shut out but the final round and maybe the tenth could have gone for Ryder but not much more.   Alvarez won and showed he could defeat those fighters ranked below but now where does Alvarez go from here?

There are many good fights to line including undefeated Middleweight Jermall Charlo, Super Middleweight David Benavidez, or David Morrell as well undefeated light heavyweight Artur Beterbiev but the real bout that Alvarez wants is Dmitry Bivol, who defeated Alvarez.  Bivol showed that he was one of the two best light heavyweights and showed that maybe for Alvarez, the light heavyweight division might be one step to much.  Up to this point, Alvarez has been able to bring his power up to Super Middleweight and he did stop former lightweight champ Sergey Kovalev, but Bivol was able to take Alvarez’s best shots.  Would a rematch be any different?  Alvarez would like to find out if it would be any different.

Media failures

Fox recent firing of Tucker Carlson and it fiasco with Dominion shows that even conservative media can be corrupted and on key issues to its viewers, unreliable.   Fox is still more accurate than its competitors whose own laundry list includes the Russian collusion hoax, the cover up of the Hunter Biden laptop which impacted an election, following the party line of Tony Fauci and gang, even when it was totally wrong. Even to this day, outside of Fox and Newsmax, Tony Fauci is still adore despite his horrendous record.   This is just the tip of the iceberg.

Much of the mainstream media was always to the left but there was difference.  When I was running a congressional campaign against incumbent Democrat, there was a controversy over debating as my candidate’s opponent refuse to debate my candidate and a liberal reporter who covered our campaign caught my opponent campaign manager in a lie in which even made the evening news.  Today that would not even happen for a leftist Democrat campaign manager can lie all he wants and there will be no problem for him. The media would cover it all.

When Dan Rather broadcast a lie about George Bush national guard record during the 2004 election that could have changed the course of the election, he was called out by many pundits and blogger.  CBS investigated the aftermath of the story after it was debunked and fired Dan Rather and those responsible for the story.

After the Russian collusion hoax, Washington Post and New York Times won Pulitzer Prizes and after it was exposed as a hoax, no prizes were returned and even to this day not one reporter or broadcaster lost their jobs.  Many of those who perpetuated this hoax still appear on many broadcasts as experts.  No one ever paid the price.  Rather got fired and Rachel Maddow who added to her ratings promoting the hoax is still at MSNBC, still well paid.   

Real journalism still continues but not in the mainstream media.  Bari Weiss, Glenn Greenwald, and Matt Taibbi still practice their trade on substack and reach millions with their reporting.  (All three of these reporters are left of center but yet managed to report the stories that others will not touch.)

Glenn Greenwald often appear on Tucker Carlson, who was willing to allow an honest leftist journalist on his show and substack is the exception to the rule when it comes to journalism for real journalism is still practiced.

The media today is nothing more than state media, repeating the talking point of the Biden Administration and much of the political class. They don’t investigate or hold those in power accountable, instead they have morphed into being part of the political class understanding its role to promote the politically correct talking points while making sure that those journalists who buckThe the narrative are censored or sidelined. 

The twitter files demonstrated the close cooperation of the FBI, various other government agencies working with social media to censor stories not in line with the prevalent left-wing narrative and promoting their own agenda.  

As for the firing of Tucker Carlson and silencing him, Fox may be soon going into a different direction, but it would appear that it may no longer be the one mainstream media friendly to conservative causes or it will attempt to promote its version of establishment conservative and move way from the more populist wing of the right. The media is beholden to the political class and no longer the vehicle designed to hold the powerful accountable.

Carlson and Fox

Fox and Tucker Carlson have split, Fox willing to part with their number one star in an unexpected move. Tucker Carlson was the one pundit who understood the forgotten America and was willing to go outside the box when it came to thinking outside the box. My own view is that Fox is trying to redefine itself in the post Rupert Murdoch era and I suspect that Murdochs did not care for Carlson reporting on January 6th.

When it came to 2020 elections, Fox team missed the bigger story which Don Surber explained, “Dominion’s cheating was a distraction from the real evil of the 2020 election: ballot harvesting. Democrats were able to get people to vote from home. Voter participation leaped from 56% to 67% — setting a century high by a large margin. People voted from home because so many Americans are too lazy to go to the polls.”

I find it interesting that every network other than Fox could push the Russian Collusion hoax and no one ever paid the price, the Pulitzer prizes never returned when it became obvious this was fake. Elon Musk exposed through the twitter files the cooperation of social media and many government agencies in censoring stories that were detrimental to Biden campaign in 2020 and then detrimental to the Biden administration. Much of the media was quiet when it was released and still is. Don Surber added, “Russiagate’s lies cost no one their jobs. The cover-up of Hunter’s laptop cost no one their jobs. The lies about the Raid on Mar-a-Lago cost no one their jobs. Welcome to post-truth America. If Carlson is surprised, he has not been paying attention to what has happened to us. We are no longer a great nation because we are led by greedy little bastards who saw nothing wrong with Hillary emailing state secrets to Red China and to foreign donors of her fake charity while secretary of State. We are led by greedy little bastards who saw nothing wrong with Barack Hussein Obama using the FBI to spy on candidate Donald John Trump. We are led by greedy little bastards who saw nothing wrong with Biden withholding a billion dollars in aid to Ukraine until it fired the prosecutor who was investigating Burisma, the company that gave his worthless son an $800,000-a-year no-show job.”

As Megyn Kelly noted, Fox news had exclusive videos on January 6th and much of it told a different story that was reported.  Fox news department outside of Carlson did nothing with it and Carlson only spent two days on it, most likely due to pressure from within the network. We know that while many crashed through windows, others were invited in. One story that was not reported by the media and that Carlson found that many of the Capital police were not informed of intelligence that their leaders knew about the potential of violence but failed to pass on. Nancy Pelosi have never questioned or been forced to account for what she could have done to prevent what happened since she could have asked for more protection. She did not.

The reality is that much of the media has long since decline into state media and as for Fox, its successes was due to counterprogramming as they reached out to the audience that other media ignore, the 50 percent that was conservative or independent. Much of the media has always been dominated by the left but today, the façade of neutrality has been lifted and the media makes no pretense whose side they are on. CNN collapse was due to the end of the Trump presidency as the reason for its existence for the past several years was gone and many leftists simply got their news from MSNBC. Fox coming collapse will be due to many conservatives deciding that after Carlson firing that the network that catered to them no longer cares.

Carlson parting with Fox is as much about defining conservatism, the right is still trying to define what conservatism means today. Fox began its quest to be a conservative alternative but as but now we are asking what conservatism is. Carlson brand of conservatism combined questioning previous conservative ideas of foreign policy and wondering to what extent America’s role in the world and viewing much of big business in opposition to the spirit of America. He even questioned free market economy when he criticized other conservative for “worshipping free market as a religion and not a tool.”

Carlson, like Robert Kennedy, feared the power of big business and big government uniting and the threat of losing our civil liberties. What Carlson saw was the rise of oligarchy threatening to place much of the Middle Class into a neo feudal state, a warning that scholar and writer Joel Kotkin has detailed for years. The Covid pandemic exposed the collapsed of our leadership class and how much of our business class, scientific class and political class united to strip away much of a freedom to save us for a virus that may have killed 3 to 4 per 1000, not much higher than many flu pandemics. As I noted in my book, America at the Abyss, Will America Survive, we saw the biggest transfer of wealth from the small businesses and the Middle class to big corporations. We witnessed big Media tech working closing with government agencies to censor thoughts they did not like and the rise of misinformation racket in which the left and corporate media will decide what is truth. This will prove to be a serious threat to our civil liberties and even to the freedom of the press.

I will repeat the argument that I made in my book, the path to conservatism will be uniting the best of Reagan conservatism with Trump populism. Trump foreign policy was not an isolationist policy but a more modest policy that concentrated on our primary rival China and supported free market policies at home. His tax plan was similar to Reagan and while he was a protectionist at heart, the one treaty he redid, NAFTA, was essentially 90 percent the original treaty, allowing more goods allowed while adding minor protection for US workers.

Carlson is on the populist wing of the movement, defending the forgotten America but to win 2024, you have to combine what worked in the past into a program of providing the average American a fair opportunity to succeed. Market economy is not a religion but a pathway to protection of liberty and prosperity. The Democratic party is the socialist party of America, using government to protect those major corporations whose goals aligned with the Party starting with the Green new deal in which we move away from traditional industry such as fossil fuels industry. What Carlson and RFK, jr are rebelling against is not free market but the uniting of major corporations and big government in a corporativism vision in which government directs big businesses into an economic polices it desire. Those businesses that cooperate are guarantee their share of the marketplace and profits. This has been tried in the past and we would recognize by two names, National socialism, or fascism.

Carlson may not have been right on his solutions, but he was right in identifying the threat before us. As for Fox, it success was due to reaching out to those forgotten Americans. It appears Fox have forgotten that.

Davis wins

Gervonta Davis “KO Stoppage ~7th Round” Defeats Ryan Garcia

LightweightsRecent FightsTom Donelsonadmin

By Tom Donelson / Member Boxing Writers Association of America (BWAA) … contributor to http://www.dmboxing since 2008

Gervonta “the Tank” fought his archrival Ryan Garcia for the pride who is the best of each other.  This was a bout that took a life of its own as Garcia called out Davis and Davis finally granted Garcia his wish.  This fight guaranteed big money and excitement for many fans who craved this fight between two undefeated fighters

Garcia came in 5 inches taller and quick hands and while advertise the slugger (Davis) and boxer (Garcia), both fighters landed power shots and accurate as they were ranked near the best in accuracy .

The first round was slow with slight advantage for Garcia as he won first round 10-9 but in the second round, Garcia appeared to hurt Tank Davis with combinations but the first punch landed by Davis, sent Garcia to the canvas in less than a minute left in the round.  Garcia got up immediately, but the message was sent, Davis needed just one punch to win the round.  The knockdown made it a 10-8 round an I had 9-18 in favor of Tank .

During the third round Tank became more accurate and Garcia looked tentative as he still recovered from the knockdown.  Tank won third round and now was 29-27 .

Davis landed 9 punches and most of power shots to the body as Garcia appeared unable to defend the body.  39-36 in favor of Tank after four round .

During the fifth round, Tank was taking control as Garcia started to look at gas.  While both landed equal number of power shots, Tank punches were more decisive.  Tank was easily in the lead on my card as it was 49-45. 

There were several exchanges as Garcia landed 6 power shots and Tank scored on 10 in the sixth round. Right hand landed for Garcia and for one brief moment, Davis stepped back, and Garcia cut off the ring, but he missed with right hand.  Davis did not look phased by Garcia shots and landed left to the body . With the fight half over, it was 59-54 in favor of Davis. (I will note that there were pundits who had Garcia winning the round).

The seventh-round saw Davis end the fight as he showed patience.  A solid left nailed Garcia who knelt on one leg.  He could not give up and the pain of the punch was seen in his face. His nose was bleeding, and the referee ended the fight.

For the first five minutes Garcia was winning the fight but the left hook that sent Garcia down with one minute left in the second round changed the fight.  From that point, it was Davis fight.  Garcia is a good young fighter who may yet become a champion but tonight, this fight showed that right now, there is a wide difference in skills between Ryan Garcia and Tank Davis.

Davis fight was his typical fight as he punched sparely but when his punches landed, they had pop and accurate. His punches had more power than Garcia.  Garcia threw 60 more punches over six and half rounds and even landed the same amount of punches, but he did not hurt Davis.  Davis punch in the second round showed the difference as he was easily losing the round but his first punch of the round that landed sent Garcia down.  I scored this round 10-8 even though he lost the first two minutes because his one shot sent Garcia down.  The knockdown was the punch that won the fight, but it took five more rounds before Davis landed the next big blow, a nasty body shot that paralyzed Garcia.  This was a fight built between two men who had large presence on the social media and fans wanted to see it.  The fight occurred and now we know that Davis is a better fighter than Garcia at this stage of their career.

Post navigation

← World Boxing Hall of Fame 1996 – REVISITED

Climate Solutions worse than the Problem

I will admit that I am skeptical of the role humans play in climate change, but there are those less skeptical who will admit that coming climate change is manageable, not the serious problem we supposed it to be.

Let begin with the reality is that climate alarmists believe that the planet is overpopulated, and the industry required to keep this population fed and clothes is causing damaging climate warming that will cause massive famine and drought.

The problem with argument is that much of the past century proves the complete opposite.  As the planet warmed and the CO2 levels increased, the planet actually prospered as we ended up feeding more people better diets and millions left poverty to a middle-class life.  Realistically speaking, the alarmist can’t even prove that additional CO2 or warming is even bad, and a better case can be made that is actually good for the planet.

The solutions being proposed are the equal of the famous line in Vietnam, “We destroyed the village to save it.”   The alarmist mind set is similar, we will destroyed the planet to save it.  Their solutions will do exactly that.

The first aspect is the elimination of fossil fuels, but they have to develop substitute for fossil fuels and the most efficient replacement, nuclear energy, they oppose.  They support the least efficient form of energy solar and wind which can’t operate when the sun don’t shine, or the wind doesn’t blow.  Without back up from fossil fuels, these renewables are incapable of fueling modern economy.

The alarmist policies will make both food and energy policy more expensive, reducing its availability for billions of people.  We saw this in Sri Lanka when the government followed the advice of the climate alarmist ESG polices the country went from being food exporter to food importer, the economy and government collapsed.  Netherlands in attempt to reach EU carbon neutral goals have forced farmers to close farms and Canada is following up with similar stupid ideas.  These policies, happening in nations who are substantial food exporters, will reduce the yield of food produced and raise prices.  The first victim will be those who are dependent upon these exports and many in the third world will have less food and more starvation.  Billions will die as result of these policies, not by changes in climate.  Without fossil fuels, the ability to get food to the market will be compromised as those vehicles responsible will be eliminated.

The restriction of fossil fuels production in the United States have led to a rise in energy prices, and as Alex Epstein noted, we have only seen 1 to 2 percent of what the climate alarmist wants and created an energy emergency. Imagine what if we get the whole plan they want to do.

Fossil fuels are needed to expand food supplies and reduce them will lead to the opposite.   When climate alarmist claims that changes in climate will lead to massive famine, that is wrong. It is the policies that will lead them.  In the past century, famines were not the creation of climate but government policies.  They were man-made phenomenon and these policies recommendation to reduce farming yields will create man-made famines.

The other aspect of climate alarmists is that they want a colder climate even though a colder climate will lead to shorter growing season and more famine.  They are even thinking of geo-engineering by attempts to block sunlight to create a colder planet.  More people normally die in colder weather than warmer weathers, so you have to ask why to create or desire a colder climate?

You have the Biden administration and various Democratic government wanting to eliminate combustible cars in favor of electric car.  Considering there are significant disadvantages to electric vehicles just as charging time, overall limitation in miles specifically in colder weather and are more expensive. With less range and priced out of many Middle-income Americans budget, many Americas will find their personal travel options limited.  The elimination of gas-powered car will hamper the ability of many Americans to advance economically.   The battle over natural gas stove oven is another battle that will increase the cost of cooking a meal for many Middle Class.

The solutions we are hearing are about reducing our living standards and destroying the economic system responsible for our economic growth to begin with.  These solutions are anti-people and not pro-environment since they do little to help the environment or reduce CO2 emission. 

Marc Morano and others made the case that the pandemic emergency were a dress rehearsal to declare a climate emergency to force changes.   The reality is that pandemic lockdown were a complete failure by every measure.  We saw lost incomes, small businesses forced out of business, children not getting educated and many people failed to follow up on treatment for serious health issues.  When you add various variables, no lives were save in lockdown states or countries versus those who did not lockdown or open up their economy earlier, but they fell behind economically and children suffered in education with minorities and the poor suffering the worse.  Hundreds of millions of people worldwide were put on the verge of starvation. 

If you repeat this on with a climate change emergency, you can substitute hundreds of millions to billions on the verge of starvation.  Much of the scientific community who favored the lockdowns, did so based bad or manipulated data and skeptics were proven right.  Much of climate science has serious flaws and their solutions are worse than the problem they diagnosed.  The scientific community showed serious flaws as they prized consensus over science during the Covid pandemic and they are no different from climate science where consensus is prized over science.  The solutions proposed will produced billion of deaths, all man made.  We have more to fear from the solutions than a warmer planet.