Europe’s Crisis: Policy Decisions and Their Consequences

Introduction

Future historians may well ask what led to the decline and ruin of Europe. The actions and decisions of key leaders in recent decades have played a pivotal role, with policies that have shaped the continent’s current challenges.

Angela Merkel: Architect of European Transformation

Dr. Tilak K. Doshi of the Daily Skeptic identifies Angela Merkel as a central figure in Europe’s troubles. In 2015, Merkel oversaw a massive wave of immigration into Europe, primarily from the Muslim world. Simultaneously, she implemented net zero policies, decommissioning nuclear power and removing fossil fuels from the German industrial base. This dual focus—shutting down nuclear and coal power plants in favor of wind and solar energy—initiated a process that is now undermining the German economy.

Merkel’s rationale for accepting millions of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa was to address Europe’s low fertility rates and to bring in “doctors and engineers” to support the economy. However, Doshi observes that Germany and the European Union instead received an influx of fighting-age males, often crime-prone and resistant to assimilation, placing additional strain on already overstretched welfare systems. As current Chancellor Merz acknowledged, “The welfare state that we have today can no longer be financed with what we produce in the economy.”

Doshi concludes that both social and economic consequences were predictable: crime surges and the rise of parallel societies in cities such as Cologne and Berlin, as well as elsewhere in Europe, including Malmo in Sweden and Southport in England. Industry has increasingly relocated to the United States and Asia in search of affordable energy, leaving Germany—once Europe’s workshop—facing stagnation. Despite these outcomes, Merkel was celebrated by Brussels and mainstream media as the moral conscience of Europe.

Ursula Von Der Leyen and the European Commission

Ursula Von Der Leyen’s tenure as Germany’s defense minister was marked by inefficiency, with the Bundeswehr operating only a handful of tanks and aircrafts. Yet, she now holds the unelected and unaccountable position of President of the European Commission. In her recent “State of the European Union” address, Von Der Leyen reaffirmed her commitment to the “green transformation,” even as European industries falter under electricity costs that are triple those in the United States. Germany’s deindustrialization continues apace, while Britain, under both Conservative and Labour governments, aligns with the EU’s climate and immigration policies and shuts down vital steelworks, refineries, and offshore energy operations.

Despite these trends, Von Der Leyen’s rhetoric invokes economic competitiveness and energy security, even as policies restrict the fossil fuel sector that would otherwise deliver growth and affordable energy. As Doshi remarks, Europe has become a civilization sacrificing its productive capacity at the altar of Gaia. Von Der Leyen also criticizes elected officials like Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and Slovakia’s Robert Fico, who resist unvetted immigration policies and defend national traditions. Orbán, for instance, is branded an “ally of Russia” for importing affordable gas and prioritizing Hungarian interests, while Fico faces similar condemnation for refusing mass migration and the latest ‘woke’ gender dogmas. Their insistence on national interests and skepticism of EU unity mark them as heretics to the European creed.

Centralization, Censorship, and Loss of Freedom

The European Union’s drive for tighter control over national politics has led to troubling developments, including the nullification of elections in Romania, interference in Moldova’s elections, and proposals for government access to private internet communications. Von Der Leyen’s push for net zero policies and increased censorship has contributed to a less free Europe, burdened by bureaucratic rules and unsustainable economic and energy policies.

A Crisis of Civilization

Europe’s difficulties are not merely economic—they reflect a deeper crisis of civilization. Doshi argues that elites such as Von Der Leyen have lost faith in the fundamental tenets of Western civilization, prioritizing sentiment over substance. The tendency to replace engineers with activists in energy ministries and to elevate failed ministers to international office has proved disastrous. The economic cost of such virtue signaling is severe: Europe’s electricity and gas prices are among the highest globally, crippling its manufacturing sector. Major industries are relocating to countries with more rational energy policies, while Europe’s share of global industrial output declines and its welfare states consume ever more of a shrinking economic pie.

Inversion of Priorities and the Cost to the Working Class

Europe’s decline is a result of deliberate choices favoring bureaucratic globalism over national aspirations. Doshi highlights Von Der Leyen’s recent call for multilateral development banks to focus on climate change rather than poverty, despite opposition from the United States. This inversion of priorities illustrates how Europe’s elites perceive the main problem of the poor as insufficient decarbonization, rather than lack of opportunity. Yet, evidence indicates that economic growth—not emissions cuts—remains the most reliable path to environmental improvement and human welfare.

The true victims are the working class, who bear the burden of high energy bills and face a future of mounting debts and a declining civilization. Doshi argues that Europe must rediscover the virtues of Western civilization that once enabled it to prosper and remain free and must reverse the momentum of its decline.

Tapper Real Game

Jake Tapper book has the following goals, first being to put him and others who help cover this up to be absolve of any journalistic wrong doing. Considering how the media help cover this up, Tapper goal is to rewrite history by saying reporters were duped. The second is to delegitimize Trump’s victory by saying by waiting as long as Biden did to leave, it gave very little time to Kamala to campaign. The reality is simple, Tapper and others knew Biden’s condition but refuse to report it. One journalist admitted he was told by a cabinet member two years earlier in 2022, that Biden needed not to run in 2024.I can’t believe that Tapper didn’t have similar sources telling him the same thing.

From the Russian collusion hoax, the Hunter Biden lap top and this, the media have consistently got big stories wrong or lied about the big stories Tapper is admitting either he is a liar or simply not a very good reporter For me, Biden stayed the candidate after that debate performance, he would have been slaughtered and lost by a bigger margin than even Kamala Harris. The media would have reported that Biden lost because he was not physically capable. Kamala on the other hand received more than double what Trump brought in and was the sitting Vice President and had the media on her side. This was a referendum on Biden/Harris years and voters decided they were ready for change. Tapper goal is to make the case that Biden allowed Trump to win by waiting and not because of Harris connection to the Biden’s year.

Tapper is merely shifting the blame of Trump victory on Biden’s and his inside team. He has not even bothered to blame Harris or key members of the administration since they obviously knew what was going on. Bottom line is that Tapper rewriting of history should not be allowed to stand. Tapper and the media were not fooled by Biden’s handler and knew what was going on. Members of the administration and those on capitol hill knew what was going on but they refuse to blow the whistle until it was too late

Turley on the Courts

Jon Turley made some good points about Alito scathing dissent on recent Supreme Court decision. Alito point was centered about the following points: that court had no right to act and had no input from the government plus court declares a crisis and then decided to act. Jon Turley noted, “Yeah, what Justice Alito is objecting to is that this is becoming increasingly improvisational. I mean, you know, you’ve covered the supreme court for years as I have, and we rarely see this level of – or number of emergency cases going in front of the Supreme Court. And a lot of them are half-baked, in the sense they don’t have the normal details, the record that you have. And the justices are expressing their frustration.” Turley added, “But in the same way, a lot of these challengers are bringing these cases fast and furious to the court. And what Justice Alito is saying is, “What are we basing our decision on? These things are coming to us with virtually no record…That is where the Supreme Court has a problem. Every single member of the nine-person body seems clearly frustrated with the bombardment of legal challenges all over the country. And even Elena Kagan can see the writing on the wall here: If liberal District Court judges act well outside of their bounds and it is tolerated, then conservative District Court judges will do the same, and the situation will only spiral.”

There is a crisis with the judicial and the Supreme Court must act. The Biden administration allowed millions of illegal in unprecedented numbers and now Trump administration has to clean up the mess quickly and Alito concern is that the courts made a serious mistake and leaves us with the question, if in the end the Courts make the wrong unconstitutional decision, what is the recourse?

Observations on 2025

Ten lessons for 2024 and moving forward

  1. The advent of Elon Musk and the death of Jimmy Carter showed an interesting divide as in the 1970’s, we were told we reached the era of limitations and needed to revamp our images, but Reagan view was that our best was still to come.  Carter essentially viewed the common narrative that we needed to view our future bleak due to limitation of our resources.   Elon Musk is not a conservative in my estimate but a moderate who believe that we are just entering a new era beginning going to where no man or woman has been before in space and Trump follows this whereas Harris, Biden and much of the left has adopted a de growth mentality in which the next generation must be satisfied with lower standard of living .
  2. The legacy media bias has been exposed as we found out that they cover up Joe Biden senility and the bias against Trump.  Legacy media showed it could no longer be trusted with the truth and the cover of Biden’s health was just one of many episodes of misinformation.
  3. Trump won the popular vote, but it was close as Trump gathered nearly 50 percent to Harris 48 percent.   Despite the fact that most voters felt the economy was bad , the world appeared on fire and there as a craziness to the Democrat party this race was still statistically close.  Harris was a weak candidate who was part of the Biden administration and could not escape the policies of the administration
  4. Trump made inroads into minorities as he nailed 46 percent of Hispanics votes including over half of males and nearly one out of every four Black males.  45% of voters members of union voted for Trump and won suburban voters overall.  This coalition is not yet set in stone, and a successful Trump administration could cement much of this and his margin in key battleground states was close as it was in 2016 in which he won and in 2020 which he lost.
  5. How stable is this coalition?  One end you have Musk and other entrepreneur who may have different objectives versus the workers including minorities workers as well as small businesses.  We see conflict in the debate over HB Visas as Musk is looking to attract the top .1 percent as he stated and many in the MAGA movement wants the program essentially eliminated.  Populism is not necessarily pro capitalist as many MAGA view socialism as evil but not entirely trust in capitalism or view the system as favoring the uber rich at their expense.  This was shown by Steve Bannon who admitted that he pushed for higher margin tax on the rich and has gone after Musk.
  6. The key to Trump is to find the ability to find a middle ground. Immigration, close the border, deport illegals, and then reform Visa program to garner the top minds around the world while protecting American workers.  In foreign policy, Ukraine will be an interesting test as Trump doesn’t want allow Putin to win the war but find peace.  On tax issues, find the right plan that increases innovation while providing something for the middle class and on trade, the key is to expand trade while protecting American workers, managed trade is another way of putting it.
  7. The long-term key to health of our economy is to attack the administration state and defanged its power.
  8. End the Green new deal, frack baby frack, nuke baby nuke, and eliminate subsidies for inferior energy and cars.  On the later point, Musk will go along since he is the leader in EV and he will win any battle on EV’s, he doesn’t need the subsidies but his rival do.  His biggest competition will come from overseas.
  9. Go to space for this is a battle of the future of humanity as by leaving our planet new world opens up new adventures and allows humanity to dream once again.  Just as Christopher Columbus opens up the world to Europe, space will provide new opportunity . 
  10. In Congress ride the horse you are on and that begins with keeping Mike Johnson as speaker.

Other lessons,

  1. Rebuild the inner city and start the process of building coalitions to get folks elected in blue cities and blue states.
  2. Defining what America First looks at and how the rise of populism impacts Europe and it’s future with America.  Is it time to revive or reduce EU influence over the hold of European country. 

From Musk editorial and other observations.  

From AfD co-chair Alice Weidel

“We don’t see that the European Union in its current state is an institution that is working well. What we need to have is free trade among the European countries, but we don’t need all the bureaucracy. … [W]e says, look, we don’t need a Commission that is actually destroying the foundation of our continent. What we need is free trade among the European countries …

[W]e think that the European treaties need to be reformed, so that every country within the European Union has the right, first of all, to have a veto against the Commission … And if a country wants to leave the European Union, why not fall automatically into a free trade zone?

What the AfD actually proposes, then, are EU-level reforms that will open to all member states the option of leaving the EU itself while remaining within the single market. Should these reforms be realized, the AfD would support leaving the EU while maintaining all of its prior EU-associated trade relationships. Now, you can agree with Weidel’s arguments or not, you can find her proposals realizable or reasonable or not, but what is very tiresome and also unsettling, is the outright refusal to address them at all, in favor of simply attacking strawman AfD policy proposals.”

Musk

“Economic renewal: The German economy, once the engine of Europe, is now mired in bureaucracy and stifling regulations. The AfD understands that economic freedom is not only desirable but also necessary. Their approach to restricting government overreach, lowering taxes and deregulating the marketplace reflects the principles that have made Tesla and SpaceX successful. If Germany wants to regain its industrial strength, it needs a party that not only talks about growth but also takes political action to create an environment in which companies can flourish without heavy government intervention… immigration and national identity: Germany has opened its borders to a very large number of migrants. While this was done with humanitarian intent, it has created significant cultural and social tensions. The AfD advocates a controlled immigration policy that priorities integration and the preservation of German culture and security. This is not about xenophobia, but about ensuring that Germany does not lose its identity in the pursuit of globalization. A nation must preserve its core values and cultural heritage to remain strong and united…Energy and independence: The energy policy pursued by the current coalition is not only economically costly, but also geopolitically naive. Germany’s decision to phase out nuclear energy and instead rely heavily on coal and imported gas, as well as volatile wind and solar power, without the battery storage necessary to maintain a stable power supply, has left the country vulnerable, especially to power outages. The AfD has a pragmatic approach to energy and is advocating a balanced approach. I hope they will consider the expansion of safe nuclear energy combined with battery storage to cushion major fluctuations in electricity consumption, because that is the obvious solution…Political realism: The traditional parties have failed in Germany. Their policies have led to economic stagnation, social unrest, and the erosion of national identity. The AfD, even if it is labelled as far-right, represents a political realism that resonates with many Germans who feel their concerns are ignored by the establishment. It addresses current issues without the political correctness that often obscures the truth. The description of the AfD as far-right is clearly wrong when you consider that Alice Weidel, the leader of the party, has a same-sex partner from Sri Lanka! Does that sound like Hitler to you? Please!”