Category: Politics and Issues

Interesting conversation on Human Trafficking with Nancy Hartman on Donelson Files. A few facts: 1. at least 30 million held against their will.

2. Slavery is against the law in most countries but it continues in these countries and some conservative Islamic country, legal

3. One country in which slavery and workers forced to work against their will. Qatar in which one death a day occurs to build stadium for World Cup 2022. Maybe we should 2022 World Cup, the blood cup.

4. Slaves work as sex workers, nail salons, shoe manufacturing and farming.

5. 200,000 estimated in US, come in through our ports or Southern Border.

6. Majority of victims under 18 but college aged women, and even some men or boys are also victim.

7. Discussed Female Genital mutilation

8. Ms. Hartman also details how to prevent it and what steps to take. Worth listening to today Donelson Files.

Among the many absurd accusations being carelessly hurled around by the Democrats these days is the most absurd of all: that the President is violating the Constitution. In fact, we are seeing another example of the Left’s habit of accusing the President – and conservatives in general – of committing the very crimes that they themselves have actually committed.
The most egregious example of this behavior is the Democrats’ accusations that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians to overthrow the 2016 election, when in fact the Clintons and their campaign had a long – and very profitable — influence-peddling scheme going on, using the Clinton Foundation as their cover – to the tune of over $100 million! Even the Mueller fiasco could not find evidence of Trump involvement.

In this case, Nancy Pelosi, through Adam Schiff, Jerrold Nadler and their cohorts, have all but destroyed any U.S. president’s ability to carry on foreign policy. What leader of a foreign government is going to want to talk confidentially with the American president when they have a well-founded fear of their conversation being broadcast to the public? The same goes for American diplomats.

What about the president talking with his own people? Executive privilege is a necessary prerogative in order for the president to perform his job of leading this massive administrative state. The Dems are heedlessly trying to destroy this necessary shield by their subpoenas of Administration officials to present testimony against their own boss. In this they have so far been aided by the feckless judiciary. If there does not arise some respect for the Office of the President on the part of higher courts, the very exercise of Executive Privilege will become the “High misdemeanors” the Dems are looking for.

The most drastic move of the zealots in the House is their attempt to place their own judgement of the President’s legitimacy over that of the American public by attempting to overthrow the sitting president before the already scheduled election less than a year hence. If this is not a blatant attempt to exercise raw power, it will do until a military coup comes along.
To make matters worse, the proceedings are being conducted IN SECRET! While the procedures leading to impeachment are not prescribed in any detail in the founding documents of the republic – probably because the Founders never envisioned a serious attack on the president’s right to exercise his office – there have been procedural precedents set by the three other impeachment efforts in American history (Andrew Johnson 1867, Richard Nixon 1974, William Clinton 1996). These procedures constitute due process and cannot in good conscience be abandoned without adequate substitutes.

Due process of law is guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Surely the President of the United States is due the same rights as any other citizen. In this regard, there is another precedent being abandoned by these outlaws, namely the secrecy of the Grand Jury proceedings. 

Schiff is demanding that the seal of secrecy which exists for the Grand Juries which heard the accusations of the Mueller investigation be broken and made public. And (unbelievably) an Obama federal judge has so ordered. This means that the ultimate decision as to further action against a defendant which has already been made by a properly constituted Grand Jury can now be exploited by a group of politicians whose motives are suspect at best. And the witnesses may be summoned before Congress on the basis of prior testimony. Our already flawed judicial system stands to be further compromised.

In summary: the USA cannot tolerate1)      a presidency which does not have the necessary tools to perform its sworn obligations to the American people.2)     a judicial system which does not protect the anonymity of those who give testimony in Grand Jury proceedings held to determine whether or not to prosecute a defendant who is presumed innocent until proven guilty,3)     or a president who is subject to the whims of any bureaucrat who wishes to cause him trouble and schemes with a powerful House Committee chairman under the cloak of anonymity,4)     nor, finally, an assault against a president’s fitness to serve while denying him the benefit of due process.These people have to be stopped before they bring down our Constitution and our democracy for future generations. © Richfield Press, 2019. All rights reserved.                                                                            

A few thoughts. http://carolinacoastonline.com/news_times/opinions/editorials/article_4561e6e4-f51b-11e9-bb25-5bf2cb299d17.html…… why this story matters. We are told repeatedly that it is about the science but climate alarmists lie on that score. If the science matters, Crockford would not have been fired but praised for her work.

We have been told that Polar Bears population would drop significantly close to extinction but the opposite happens. Crockford work demolished an important selling point of climate change impact upon Arctic creatures.

This should have forced a reevaluation of some claims made but instead it saw the firing of the scientist who debunked these claims So far no credible scientist have challenged her claims and her research is excellent on this score. The reality is that questionable science has been used to back alarmist claims from the Medieval Warming Period not happening despite some 1000 plus studies saying otherwise to Polar Bears are dying.

The weakness of the science is becoming more obvious as the empiric evidence don’t support the main thesis that the increase of CO2 is having overall negative result on the planet. Professor Crockford story is instructive.

This is not about the science but it is about politics and the use of this to transform our society into a socialist paradise or whatever. I once told a researcher on Heartland Institute who wins the political battle wins the scientific battle.

He told me that the science will win and our side have the science. I told him it is irrelevant about the Science since his opponent are not fighting in the scientific realm but the political realm.

This proves my point that scientific battle is secondary to the political battle. When the science goes against the Alarmist they either change the subject, censor the sources that disagrees with them or simply manipulate the data to get what they want.